From the Coach guide

Can you run faster than you could 4 weeks ago?

Your hardest runs show what you can do now, and how that is changing.

Your hardest runs

Coach finds the fastest 1 mi, 2 mi or 5 km inside each run that was above easy effort. It converts each one to a 5K time.

The comparison

Coach compares your 2 best efforts from the last 4 weeks with the 4 weeks before. A change counts only when it is larger than your own usual spread and at least 2%.

Limits

A best effort shows what you did, not your limit. Training runs read slower than races. Hills, heat and GPS errors make them slower too.

No hard runs

If you had no hard run in the last 4 weeks, Fitness shows your last reading. A gap is not a decline.

Easy-run efficiency

Coach also compares your pace at a given heart rate on easy runs. It changes a lot from run to run, so it only supports the reading. It decides only when you have no hard runs.

Threshold tests

A threshold test or a race is a direct measurement. When you have one, it replaces the best-effort reading.

About Apple's Cardio Fitness estimate

Apple's Cardio Fitness is a VO2max estimate from your Apple Watch, shown here as a slow, 28-day-smoothed trend — it never sets a pace, zone, VDOT or target. Independent lab comparisons found it can underestimate true VO2max by around 6 mL/kg/min, with a typical error of about 7. The estimate also depends on the watch and its software. Heat, dehydration, caffeine and altitude all tend to push a single reading low, which is why only a change that holds for two consecutive 28-day windows is ever surfaced, and even then only as a suggestion to retest sooner.

Research and limits.

Race-performance equations

Comparing efforts at different distances

Daniels and Gilbert built equations that rate a performance from its distance and time. They make a 1 mi, a 2 mi and a 5 km effort comparable.

What this does not show

The equations come from races. A training run that was not flat out reads lower than a race would. Coach uses the trend, not the number alone.

  • Daniels & Gilbert, 1979 — Oxygen Power: Performance Tables for Distance Runners

Test–retest reliability study

How large a change has to be

Trained runners repeated a track test of critical speed within 2.0%, and within 1.3% once they knew the test. Coach counts a change only when it is at least 2% and larger than the spread of your own best efforts.

What this does not show

The study tested 10 trained men on a track, not training runs. Your own spread is usually larger, and then Coach uses it instead.

Monitoring research; app-defined trend

Heart rate and running efficiency

Buchheit’s review discusses exercise heart rate as one way to monitor training responses, interpreted alongside training context and measurement variability.

What this does not show

Coach’s speed-to-heart-rate ratio, four-week comparison, and change threshold are an implementation choice. This review does not validate them as a fitness test or VO₂ max estimate.

Independent lab validation studies

Apple Watch Cardio Fitness vs. lab VO₂max

Lambe and colleagues compared Apple Watch Cardio Fitness against lab-measured VO₂max in two separate cohorts and found a consistent underestimate, with a mean error of roughly 6 mL/kg/min and typical absolute error around 7.

What this does not show

These studies measure Apple's algorithm's accuracy against a lab standard; they say nothing about Coach's 28-day-median, two-window flagging rule, which is an app-chosen display threshold, not a validated one. Accuracy can differ between watch models and software versions.

  • Lambe et al., 2025 — Apple Watch Cardio Fitness validation, PLOS ONE
  • Lambe et al., 2026 — Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Digital Health